Winback for Scaffolders
One customer going quiet is a fifth of your turnover, and nobody announces it
The arithmetic of a small customer base
An engineer-designed complex scaffold is £8,000. An internal birdcage, £4,000. A commercial system scaffold, £1,500. A domestic tube and fitting job, £850. A chimney scaffold, £600.
Most trades on this site have hundreds or thousands of customers, so losing one is a rounding error. You have perhaps twenty to forty organisations that place work, and three or four of them probably account for half your turnover.
That changes the mathematics of a lapse completely. When a main contractor stops placing packages with you, it is not a customer lost — it is potentially a fifth of the year gone, and it happens silently. There is no cancellation. The enquiries simply stop, and because construction is lumpy anyway, it takes three or four months before anybody says “we have not heard from them in a while”.
By then the replacement is embedded, has done four jobs, and has met everybody in the office.
That delay is the whole problem. In a business with thirty customers, noticing is most of the work.
Why they stopped, and how recoverable each reason is
A price that was too high on one package. Very recoverable. They took one job elsewhere and simply never came back. Frequently nobody even remembers which job it was.
A programme failure. You were late, or a gang did not turn up, and it cost them days. Recoverable, but only with an acknowledgement — construction people respect a straight admission far more than an explanation.
A paperwork problem. A handover certificate that was late, an inspection record that failed their audit, insurance documents that took a fortnight. This is the commonest cause and the most fixable, and it is almost never mentioned to you.
Your contact moved on. Extremely common in construction and not a loss at all — it is two opportunities. The new person at their old firm does not know you, and your old contact is now placing work somewhere new.
Four causes, and three of them are addressable in a phone call and a fortnight of internal tidying.
The ratio
An engineer-designed scaffold is £8,000. Our Booked package is £99 a month — £1,188 a year. One such job covers nearly seven years.
The winback arithmetic is unusually stark. A contractor placing a package a month at an average of £2,000 is £24,000 a year. Recovering one of those pays for every marketing service on this site for two decades, and there are typically two or three such relationships dormant in a scaffolding firm at any moment.
What we’d actually do
A customer-by-customer review with dates. Twenty to forty names, the value each placed last year and this, and the date of their last enquiry. On a list that short, the ones that have gone quiet are obvious the moment it is written down — and almost no firm has ever written it down.
A direct conversation, at the right level. Not an email. A call to the person who places the work, asking plainly whether something went wrong. In construction this is a normal conversation and it is rarely awkward.
Fix the paperwork first if that is the answer. It usually is, and going back before it is fixed wastes the one call you get.
Follow the people who moved. Both directions: the new person at the old firm, and your old contact at their new one.
A quarterly review afterwards, so a customer going quiet is noticed in six weeks rather than six months. That habit is worth more than the winback itself.
What good looks like at twelve months
- A written customer list with last-enquiry dates, reviewed quarterly
- Every dormant account asked directly what happened
- Paperwork issues identified and resolved rather than suspected
- Contacts who changed firms followed in both directions
- Quiet accounts surfacing in weeks, which is the permanent gain
The mistakes we see most
Not noticing for six months. With thirty customers this is the central failure, and it is purely a matter of nobody keeping a list.
Assuming it was price. It is more often paperwork or a programme failure, and price is the easiest thing for them to say if you ask badly.
Emailing instead of ringing. Construction runs on phone calls. An email about a dormant account will not be answered.
Losing a contact who moved. They took their placing habit with them and nobody followed.
The first ninety days
Weeks 1–4. The customer review, with values and dates. On a list this short it takes an afternoon and it usually identifies two or three dormant accounts nobody had registered.
Weeks 5–8. The conversations, and whatever internal fix the answers point at — normally certificates and documentation turnaround.
Weeks 9–12. Moved contacts traced, and the quarterly review set up so this becomes routine.
At ninety days the measure is whether any dormant contractor has enquired again. With relationships worth £24,000 a year, one is a very good quarter.
Where this lands in Gaffer
Work groups under the contractor rather than sitting as unconnected jobs, so a customer placing less this year than last is visible rather than inferred.
Contacts sit under the company, which means somebody moving firms keeps their history — and shows up as a person you already know at a business you do not yet work for.
And because inspection records and handover certificates issue from the system against each job, the paperwork problem that quietly ended a relationship is one you can demonstrate has been fixed.
The firms that asked once and never came back
Alongside the customers who stopped, there is a second list of about the same size, and most firms have never written it down.
These are the organisations that enquired, took a price, and then went quiet. No relationship ever started. In a market of thirty buyers, a contractor who asked you for a price two years ago and has never asked again is nearly as significant as one who used you and stopped, because both represent a door that is already slightly open.
What happened is usually one of three things. Your price was high on that particular package and they never tested you again. They were shopping the market to check their existing supplier and were never going to move. Or — most commonly — they used you for a comparison, thought you were fine, and simply forgot you existed, because you never rang them again.
That third group is straightforwardly recoverable and it takes a phone call. Refer to the job you priced, ask what they are working on now, mention what you have capacity for. Nothing about the original price needs revisiting.
The discipline worth building is at the front end: every price that goes out gets a follow-up two weeks later and a note in six months. It stops this list forming in the first place, which is a better outcome than being good at working it.
Questions scaffolders ask
Is it awkward to ask why they stopped? Far less than you expect. Construction is direct and the answer is usually given straight.
What if the answer is price? Then you know where you sit, and you can decide whether to price the next one differently. That is useful either way.
How often should I review the list? Quarterly. On thirty names it takes twenty minutes and it is the most valuable twenty minutes in this programme.
What about the domestic side? Different problem entirely — a large list of one-off customers, handled the way any homeowner trade handles it.
Get your free website review · Bigger outfit? Talk to us