Compliance Marketing for Lift Engineers

Your market is a diary, and somebody else is already keeping it

Get your free website review See what we build

  • No contract
  • From £29 a month
  • First month free

The work arrives on a date you can read in advance

  • £14,900Passenger lift modernisation
  • £14,350Domestic through-floor platform lift
  • £9,200Platform lift installation
  • £850Annual service contract
  • £350LOLER thorough examination

Almost no other trade on this site has demand this predictable. Lifting equipment used to lift people is subject to thorough examination under LOLER at intervals that are commonly six months for passenger lifts, or in accordance with an examination scheme drawn up by a competent person. That is not a manufacturer’s suggestion. It is a legal duty sitting on whoever controls the building.

So the enquiry does not begin with somebody deciding they want a lift engineer. It begins with a date passing. Which means the marketing problem is not generating interest — it is being the name attached to that date when it comes round.

There is a second consequence, and it is the one most lift companies under-use. The thorough examination and the maintenance are different things, done for different reasons, frequently by different parties. The report that comes out of an examination is a list of defects somebody now has to act on. The examination generates the work, and whoever explains that clearly tends to get both.

What that looks like as marketing rather than as paperwork

  • Write for the duty holder, not for the lift.

    The person who needs you is a managing agent, a facilities manager, a school business manager or a block’s directors — somebody with a legal obligation and no engineering background. Almost every lift website is written for another engineer.

  • Separate examination from maintenance in plain words.

    These get conflated constantly, and a duty holder who believes a service visit discharged their examination duty is exposed without knowing it. Explaining the difference is genuinely useful and it is also a sales argument.

  • Publish what a defect report actually means.

    A thorough examination report lands on somebody’s desk with categorised defects and timescales attached, and they usually have no idea how urgent any of it is. Translating that is the moment the remedial work gets ordered.

  • Say what happens when a lift is out of service.

    For a block with elderly residents or a school with an accessibility duty, downtime is the real fear rather than the invoice. A response commitment is worth more than a price list.

  • Cover the domestic side separately.

    A through-floor lift at £14,350 is bought by a family adapting a house, often under time pressure and sometimes with grant funding involved. That is a completely different reader from a facilities manager and it deserves its own page.

The ratio

One modernisation is £14,900. Our Booked package is £99 a month — £1,188 a year. That single job covers more than twelve years.

The arithmetic here is unusually kind because the service contract is the real prize. A contract at £850 a year renews on a legal rhythm, and a portfolio of forty is £34,000 of recurring work that arrives whether or not anybody markets in a given month. The job is winning the contract once and then never giving anyone a reason to re-tender.

What we’d actually build

  • A duty-holder page

    Explaining thorough examination, who is responsible and what the intervals commonly are, written for somebody who manages a building rather than a lift.

  • A defect report explainer

    Which is the page that converts examinations into remedial orders.

  • A response and downtime page

    Because that is what a block or a school is actually buying.

  • A domestic adaptations section

    For through-floor and platform lifts, written for a family rather than a facilities team.

  • A tender-ready capability pack

    Accreditations, insurance limits, engineer competencies — because a managing agent’s procurement will ask, and the firms that cannot answer quickly get dropped.

What good looks like at twelve months

  • The site speaks to duty holders rather than to other engineers
  • Examination and maintenance are explained as separate duties
  • Defect reports convert into scheduled remedial work
  • Service contracts renew without going out to tender
  • Domestic enquiries arrive through their own route

The mistakes we see most

  • Writing for engineers.

    The buyer is an agent with a legal obligation and no technical background, and the site talks straight past them.

  • Treating the examination as the job.

    It is the cheapest thing you do and it generates everything else. Marketed as an inconvenience, it produces nothing.

  • No answer on response times.

    For a building with residents this is the deciding question, and most lift companies leave it off the site entirely.

  • Letting contracts renew silently.

    A contract nobody has heard from in three years goes to tender the moment somebody reviews costs.

The first ninety days

  1. Weeks 1–4

    The duty-holder pages written and live, and the contract portfolio loaded with renewal and examination dates so nothing depends on memory.

  2. Weeks 5–8

    The defect report explainer published and linked from every examination sent out, so remedial work has somewhere to be understood.

  3. Weeks 9–12

    The domestic route separated and running, and renewals prompting far enough ahead to be a conversation rather than a decision already taken.

Where this lands in Gaffer

Every lift sits against its site with its examination interval, so the clock is a record rather than a spreadsheet somebody maintains.

Defect reports attach to the job, which means the remedial quote references the actual finding instead of being rebuilt from memory a fortnight later.

And contract renewal dates prompt in advance, so the conversation happens before procurement has started rather than after.

The second regulator nobody mentions

LOLER is a safety duty and it is the one the trade talks about. There is another, and it produces a different kind of urgency in a different kind of building.

Where a service is provided to the public, there is a duty to make reasonable adjustments so that disabled people are not put at a substantial disadvantage. A lift that has been out of service for three weeks in a building with a first-floor consulting room, a community hall, a small hotel or a solicitor’s office is not just an inconvenience — it is potentially a failure of that duty, and the person responsible is usually the occupier rather than the landlord.

That reframes downtime completely. To a facilities manager weighing a repair quote against next quarter’s budget, “the lift is broken” is a maintenance decision. “Your building is currently inaccessible to a wheelchair user, and that is your duty rather than ours” is a different conversation, and it is a true one.

It also opens a market the trade barely markets to at all: small public-facing premises with one platform lift, no maintenance contract, and nobody who has ever thought about who is responsible for it. A page addressed to them — what the equipment needs, what happens when it fails, and why it matters beyond the inconvenience — reaches buildings no tender process will ever put in front of you.

Questions lift engineers ask

Is the examination interval always six months? Commonly for passenger lifts, but it can be twelve for some lifting equipment, or as set by a written scheme of examination from a competent person. Saying that accurately is part of what makes the rest credible.

Should I market to residents or to agents? Agents and directors for blocks, families for domestic. They are separate audiences and mixing them weakens both.

Do I need to explain the law on my own site? Explaining it plainly is most of the value. Interpreting it for a specific building is a conversation, and the page should say so.

Is domestic worth it alongside commercial? Often yes — the job value is comparable and the competition is thinner, but it needs its own page and its own tone.

Get your free website review · Bigger outfit? Talk to us

See what we'd do for lift engineers

Put your website in and we'll tell you what's losing you work — speed, mobile, your Google profile, reviews and the pages you're missing. Two minutes, no call unless you want one.

Get your free website reviewSee pricing