Content Marketing for Landscape Gardeners

Gardens are decided in January and built in May. Content owns the months in between

Get your free website review See what we build

  • No contract
  • From £29 a month
  • First month free

The longest daydream in the trades

Full garden landscaping is £5,105. An Indian sandstone patio, £2,970. Fencing, £1,495. A garden clearance, £1,300. Turfing, £1,045.

Nobody wakes up in April and decides to spend £5,105 on a garden that week. They look out at a wet, tired garden in January and think something has to be done about that. Then they spend three or four months looking at other people’s gardens, deciding what they like, working out roughly what it costs and gathering nerve.

By the time they contact anybody, the decision is largely made. The question is only who does it.

That gap — January thinking to May building — is the longest and most reachable buying window of any trade on this site, and it is almost entirely uncontested. Landscapers overwhelmingly market in spring, to people who have already chosen.

What they are searching in the gap

Patio ideas, sandstone versus porcelain, how much does a patio cost per square metre, what to plant in a north-facing garden, decking or paving, how much does landscaping cost, small garden ideas, how long does turf take to establish, when should I lay a lawn.

These are enormous in volume, seasonal in a completely predictable way, and answered mostly by national retailers selling materials rather than by anyone who could actually build the thing.

A landscaper who answers them properly, with photographs of their own finished work attached, is doing something no material retailer can: showing the outcome and being available to build it.

The ratio

A full garden is £5,105. Our Booked package is £99 a month — £1,188 a year. One job covers over four years.

And unlike most content, garden content ages well. A patio guide written this January is still working in three years because sandstone has not changed. What it needs is fresh photographs, which you generate anyway.

What we’d actually write

A materials comparison, honestly done. Indian sandstone versus porcelain versus block. Cost per square metre, how each weathers, which needs sealing, which suits a shaded garden. This is the search that precedes almost every patio job and it is dominated by people selling one of the options.

Cost per square metre, published. Patios, fencing per metre, turfing, full gardens as a range. It filters out the people whose budget is a tenth of the job and pre-qualifies everyone else, and quotes close faster when the customer already knows the ballpark.

Seasonal planning pages. What to do when — clearance and fencing in winter, hard landscaping in early spring, planting in autumn. It gives a January reader something to do with their impatience and puts you in the conversation four months early.

Problem-garden pages. North-facing, sloped, clay soil, tiny courtyard, overlooked. People search their specific problem, and a page that recognises it converts far better than a general gallery.

Grown-in galleries with words attached. A garden photographed two summers after completion, with a note on what was planted and how it has filled in. Nothing else you can publish sells as well.

What good looks like at twelve months

  • A materials guide that ranks and does the educating for you
  • Published rates that arrive before the enquiry does
  • Four or five problem-garden pages covering the situations you actually get asked about
  • Winter publishing, so you are visible in the months your competitors are silent
  • Quotes closing faster because the customer arrives with a realistic figure

The mistakes we see most

Only marketing in spring. By spring the decision is made. January is when it is being formed.

A gallery with no words. Beautiful and invisible to search. Every garden needs a sentence about the problem it solved.

Refusing to publish rates. Per-square-metre ranges leave your negotiating room intact and save you quoting for people who were never going to buy.

Ignoring maintenance. Every garden you build is a maintenance customer for a decade if the subject is raised, and content is the natural place to raise it.

The first ninety days

Weeks 1–4. The materials comparison and published rates. Between them they do the educating and the qualifying that currently happens on the phone.

Weeks 5–8. Problem-garden pages, chosen from the questions you get asked most.

Weeks 9–12. The seasonal planning set, timed so the winter pages are live before winter rather than during it, plus grown-in photographs added to the gardens you finished last year.

At ninety days the measure is whether enquiries are arriving in February rather than April. That shift is worth more than any other single change to a landscaper’s year.

Where this lands in Gaffer

Job records hold the photographs, the materials and what was actually planted, which is where the grown-in galleries and the problem-garden pages come from — you are describing work you did rather than writing in the abstract.

Quote templates for patios, fencing, turfing and clearance carry the real rates, so the published figures stay honest and get flagged when your pricing moves.

And because a finished garden can open a maintenance schedule, the customer who found you through a January article becomes a recurring one rather than a single job.

Bank the photographs in July or you cannot publish in January

There is a practical trap in everything above, and it catches nearly every landscaper who tries this.

The publishing happens in winter. The photographs do not exist in winter. A garden in January photographs as mud and bare stems, and no amount of good writing rescues a January article illustrated with a January garden.

So the content year runs backwards from the reading year. Between June and September, when the gardens you built in spring have filled out and the light is decent, you gather the material for pages that will not go live for four or five months. It is twenty minutes on a job you are already visiting: the finished view, the same angle you shot on completion, a couple of details, and a note of what was planted where.

Two other things worth capturing while you are there. The before photograph, dug out and paired with the after — the contrast is what makes somebody imagine their own garden differently. And the second-summer shot of a garden from the previous year, which is the single most persuasive image in this trade because it shows what a scheme actually becomes rather than how it looked the day the fencing came down.

Do that through one season and the winter writing is straightforward. Skip it and January arrives with nothing to show, which is the point at which most landscapers quietly abandon the idea and go back to marketing in April.

Questions landscape gardeners ask

Is anyone really reading about gardens in January? More than at any other time. That is when the dissatisfaction sets in and the planning starts.

Won’t publishing rates cost me negotiating room? Ranges do not. They cost you the enquiries you were going to lose anyway, earlier and more cheaply.

How much writing is this? Five or six substantial pages in the first year, then photographs and seasonal refreshes.

What about the smaller jobs? Fencing and turfing pages bring in work in the months when nobody is commissioning a full garden, which is exactly when you want them.

Get your free website review · Bigger outfit? Talk to us